STEVEN A. HAYNES
Plaintiff-Appellee
vs.
ADMINISTRATOR, OHIO
BUREAU OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, ET AL.
Defendant-Appellants
No. 52370
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, CUYAHOGA
COUNTY
Slip Opinion
January 22, 1987, Decided
Civil Appeal from Common Pleas Court
Case No. 065,622
COUNSEL
JAMES A. HAYNES, ESQ., For
Plaintiff-Appellee.
ANTHONY J. CELEBREZZE, JR., Attorney General,
RENEE SCOTT CHESTANG, Assistant Attorney General, For
Defendant-Appellants.
JUDGES
RICHARD M. MARKUS, CHIEF JUSTICE, ANN McMANAMON, JUDGE, JOHN V.
CORRIGAN, JUDGE
OPINION
JOURNAL ENTRY and OPINION
PER CURIAM:
We sustain the single assignment of error, reverse the common
pleas court's judgment, and reinstate the board of review's
decision. The board's decision was not unlawful, unreasonable, or
against the manifest weight of the evidence. R.C. 4141.28(0). The
signed statement by the claimant's ex-wife provided credible
evidence of the cost of support for their child. R.C. 4141.28(J);
Simon v. Lake Geauga Printing Co.
(1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 41, 43-45; Angelkovski v.
Buckeye Potato Chips Co. (1983), 11 Ohio App. 3d
159, 161. That statement and the claimant's testimony contain
competent, credible evidence to support the board's decision that
the claimant did not provide at least one-half his child's support
during the 90 days prior to his claim for benefits.
It is, therefore, considered that said appellants recover of
said appellee their costs herein.
It is ordered that a special mandate be sent to said Court to
carry this judgment into execution.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate
pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
DISPOSITION
Reversed.